 Slayer
VIP
Samael-Bezwinger
 
Sternzeichen: 
Geschlecht: 
Beiträge: 2398
Status: Überzeugter Single
Zum Seitenanfang
Link zu diesem Beitrag
|
 |
Re: Whitneys Kurz-Review via Facebook für Silent Hill Historical Society
« Antwort #1 von: 25.10.12 um 22:03 » |
 Zitieren
|
Hmm kurz gesagt: Schraubt eure Erwartungen runter, oder der Film su**ed as* 
...war ja klar. Dann sind die 7.8 z.Z. auf IMDB fake Ratings >_>
Lassen wir uns mal überraschen!
|
|
|
|
Heinz
VIP
Baseballschläger-Halunke
Bayern
Geschlecht:
Beiträge: 430
Status: Single
Zum Seitenanfang
Link zu diesem Beitrag
|
|
Re: Whitneys Kurz-Review via Facebook für Silent Hill Historical Society
« Antwort #2 von: 25.10.12 um 22:43 » |
Zitieren
|
Ein weiteres Review (ohne Spoiler):
This is my first review on IMDb. Happen to be in Hong Kong where the movie is released first before everywhere else.
I feel compelled to be one of the first ones to write a review before this page is flooded with fake reviews written by the staff and people hired by the movie studio like it is for most other films nowadays. This is one of the worst movies I have seen in a very long time.
I saw the first Silent Hill movie when it came out a few years ago. I don't remember loving it but there were memorable scenes and it did creep me out a little in the way a horror movie is supposed to. Radha Mitchell and Sean Bean did a good job in the first movie and the story was good enough for someone like me who haven't played the video game. The special effects were impressive and went along quite well with the plot and directing to create a horror theme. Overall it was good entertainment (still talking about the first Silent Hill movie).
This new one, on the other hand, is a complete waste of time and money. Where to begin… The story is terrible. There is basically no point to the movie. Random characters, both people and monsters, that contribute little to nothing to the story keep coming and going. Some characters that are supposed to be important to the story get taken out one way or another with no explanation. The plots simply don't make sense even by horror films standards. The writer tries too hard to put unnecessary and unrelated scenes together using sub-par special effects and CGI.
Directing by Michael J. Bassett is extremely amateur. Note that he is also the writer of the movie. I'm not sure if he actually thinks he's doing a good job or simply gave up halfway through it. Either way I would be very surprised if he's given another chance to write or direct a big budget film after this.
The script is laughable. The whole story is basically written in bad and lengthy monologues in details recited by characters in front of funny sets. There are random characters that show up to tell a boring background story in details then get taken out with no explanation. The wording of the script sounds like it was written by some middle school kid who just finished seeing some cheesy movies from the 80s for the first time.
Casting is, well, also terrible. Besides decent performance by good actors like Sean Bean, Radha Mitchell, and Malcolm McDowell as one would expect, the rest of the cast is pretty much a joke. I want to say Carrie-Anne Moss did a decent job but the bad script and make-up screw her over. The main character played by Adelaide Clemens is not impressive and poor editing didn't help her performance. Another main character played by Kit Harington is painful to watch, and the director didn't give him a chance with an abysmal script.
The ending (and the whole movie for the matter) is far-fetched and unoriginal. Basically nothing makes sense from start to finish.
Naja, es war ja fast klar, dass der Film ähnlich Scheiße wie der erste Teil werden würde und kaum einen Bezug zur Silent Hill - Serie bzw. Teil 3 haben wird. Wer hätte ernsthaft etwas anderes erwartet ? Gehofft haben wir es wohl alle, aber wirklich erwartet ? Wohl kaum... 
|
|
|
|
WHOLE
Moderator
Forum Helfer
Legendäres Ehrenmitglied
 Yes/No |
Geschlecht:
Beiträge: 35761
Zum Seitenanfang
Link zu diesem Beitrag
|
|
Re: Externe Reviews
« Antwort #4 von: 26.10.12 um 11:48 » |
Zitieren
|
Links für Gäste nicht sichtbar, hier mal nur das Fazit:
"Silent Hill: Revelation, like many video game to motion picture adaptations, is a tricky beast to judge. That's especially true given the shadow it stands in. Those who enjoy the games will generally enjoy this particular big screen treatment, especially those who dug Silent Hill 3. Meanwhile, those who loved the first movie will be disappointed. Yes, it stays true to the subject matter, but it doesn't have the sense of confidence, the bravado. Virtually no risks are taken.
Silent Hill: Revelation may be unoriginal, but it's not offensive. And thank God the running time is reasonable; it's only an hour and a half long. When judged apart from the game, just as just a movie… one that features a demonic little girl, crazy occultists, zombified nurses, a buffed up dude with a giant metal pyramid for a head sporting a an even bigger sword, all wrapped up in cheesy 3D… it's pretty much the perfect thing to catch this weekend, since Halloween is right around the corner."
|
|
|
|
Ceremonials
Messerstecher
Baden-Württemberg
 Stay back! |
Sternzeichen: 
Geschlecht:
Beiträge: 115
Status: Überzeugter Single
Zum Seitenanfang
Link zu diesem Beitrag
|
|
Re: Externe Reviews
« Antwort #6 von: 26.10.12 um 20:13 » |
Zitieren
|
Naja, eigentlich ist es mir egal, ob der Film schlecht ist oder nicht. Ich will nur nicht dass mir mein gutes Bild vom ersten Film zerstört wird.
Zu den Reviews: Wurden nicht genaaau die gleichen Dinge zum ersten Teil gesagt? Er ist doch soo unlogisch und nichts passt zusammen, die Schauspieler waren nicht gut und so weiter. Ich weiß nicht, wozu manche Menschen ein Hirn haben, ich hab ihn mit 6 anderen angeschaut und nur ich hab die Handlung vom Game gekannt, mir kam es vor als hätten die anderen teilweise sogar mehr verstanden als ich.
Alle fanden ihn klasse. Seit ich Silent Hill und Resident Evil gesehen habe nehme ich solche Reviews nicht mehr ernst, imdb kann ich stellenweise noch nachvollziehen, die Spinner von Rotten Tomatoes sind mir aber ein Rätsel.
Resident Evil: Apocalypse 21%
Silent Hill 29%
ja ne, ist klar 
Edit: grad auf facebook gelesen hihi fands passend! 
C'mon guys It can't be THAT bad, bad RT reviews yeah so what RT would rate their own mother 2/10...
|
| « Zuletzt bearbeitet: 26.10.12 um 20:19 von Ceremonials » |
|
|
|
| | | | | | |
Index
Disclaimer
Antworten
Thema versenden
Druckansicht
Autor